Earmark CPE

Earn CPE Anytime, Anywhere

Blake Oliver

The Bitcoin Debate: CPA Skeptic vs. CPA Believer

· ·

When Bitcoin hit $100,000 in December, I knew it was time to explore this controversial asset further. So, I invited Noah Buxton, co-founder and CEO of The Network Firm LLP, onto the Earmark Podcast for a fascinating discussion about Bitcoin’s true value.

As a CPA who first learned about Bitcoin when it was worth just $1, I’ve always approached it with healthy skepticism. Call it a professional habit—we accountants are trained to question everything.

Why Should Bitcoin Be Worth Anything? 

Here’s what keeps nagging: Bitcoin produces no earnings, pays no dividends, and seems mainly useful for speculation (and sometimes less-than-legal activities). So why should it be worth $100,000, or $1,000, or even $1?

Noah acknowledged my concerns about speculation driving prices. But he made an interesting case for Bitcoin as “digital gold,” arguing that its fixed supply and independence from central control make it appealing in our inflation-prone world.

The Network Effect Is Real

One question I often hear is: “Why Bitcoin? Can’t anyone create a cryptocurrency?”

Noah pointed out something I hadn’t fully appreciated – the massive infrastructure built around Bitcoin. We’re talking thousands of businesses facilitating payments and billions invested in mining equipment. That’s not easily replicated.

But here’s the thing: being first doesn’t guarantee staying first. (Remember Myspace?) While Bitcoin has a strong lead, its dominance isn’t guaranteed forever.

The Government Bitcoin Play

Here’s where things get interesting. Crypto lobbyists are pushing for the U.S. government to start buying Bitcoin as a national reserve—billions of dollars worth annually.

As a skeptical CPA, this makes me nervous. It’s like early Bitcoin hold are pushing for taxpayers to become their exit liquidity. When you consider that roughly 10,000 wallets control a huge portion of Bitcoin, this starts looking like a massive wealth transfer waiting to happen.

The Real Promise: Blockchain

Despite my Bitcoin skepticism, I’m bullish on blockchain technology. Noah called it “the biggest accounting innovation since double-entry bookkeeping,” and I think he’s onto something there.

His firm, The Network Firm LLP, is doing fascinating work in digital asset auditing. They’ve even built their own software called Ledger Lens to tackle the unique challenges of verifying blockchain transactions.

What This Means for Accountants

As CPAs, we’re in an interesting position. While we need to maintain our professional skepticism about Bitcoin’s value proposition, we can’t ignore the growing importance of blockchain technology in our field.

The skills needed to audit and verify blockchain transactions will only become more valuable. Whether Bitcoin remains the dominant digital asset or not, the underlying technology is here to stay.

My Take

After my conversation with Noah, I’m still skeptical about Bitcoin’s current valuation. But I’m also more appreciative of the complexity of the debate.

As accounting professionals, we need to tread a careful line: maintaining healthy skepticism while remaining open to genuine innovation. The future of our profession might depend on achieving this balance.

Want to hear my complete discussion with Noah? Check out Episode 83 of the Earmark Podcast.

How Sikich Is Transforming the Accounting Firm Model—And Putting Employees First

· ·

Private equity is flowing into CPA firms at a record pace. That’s great for partners, but what does it mean for everyone else?

To find out, I spoke with Ryan Spohn, CFO of Sikich, a professional services firm headquartered in Chicago. Sikich ranks 27th on Accounting Today’s Top 100, employs more than 1,900 people worldwide, and posts $364 million in annual revenue. 

Ryan told me how Sikich departed from the traditional partnership model, opening the door to outside investment, expanding employee ownership, and creating a culture where wellness and flexibility matter as much as the bottom line.

Why the Traditional Partnership Model Is Losing Appeal

Many CPA firms are still structured as partnerships, with all the profits distributed among the partners each year. Unfortunately, this model often leaves little to no funds for investing in new technology, acquiring other companies, or hiring new talent.

“Firms pass the hat around to fund any major initiative,” Ryan told me. “If someone is close to retirement, they may not see a reason to reinvest in the business. That becomes a big obstacle for growth and innovation.”

Alternative Practice Structure: Splitting Assurance from Advisory

Sikich addressed these challenges by implementing an alternative practice structure. This arrangement separates the firm’s attestation work, conducted under Sikich CPA, from its consulting and advisory services offered through Sikich LLC. The CPA side complies with state ownership regulations, while Sikich LLC can secure outside funding.

“An alternative practice structure solves the financing problem for CPA firms,” Ryan said. “It lets us bring in outside capital for our consulting and advisory lines without the usual regulatory hurdles on the assurance side.”

$250 Million from Bain—But Retaining Control

With its new structure, Sikich secured a $250 million minority investment from Bain Capital’s Special Situations Group. Unlike some private equity deals that grant majority control to investors, Sikich maintained control.

“A majority investment was a nonstarter,” Ryan explained. “We want this to be a place where people can build long-term careers, and we need to preserve our culture and client relationships.”

The result? Sikich has the cash to “supercharge” growth, including larger acquisitions, tech investments, and employee development. They’ve averaged 20% annual growth over the past five years and aim to accelerate.

Expanding Equity from 5% to 30%

One of the boldest moves was expanding equity ownership in the firm. Traditionally, only partners who made a sizable buy-in received a share, often waiting decades for any payout. Sikich changed that approach.

“Before, maybe 5% of employees were partners with K-1s,” Ryan said. “We eliminated the complex buy-in, automated the reinvestment of net income into the firm, and now around 30% of our people have units. There’s also a discretionary bucket for rising stars. It’s a big shift in how we reward and retain top talent.”

Since the firm operates outside a strict partnership model, employees don’t struggle with K-1 distributions. They also aren’t required to borrow money to gain ownership—equity is granted based on performance and potential.

Putting People First: Wellness and Work-Life Integration

Sikich’s equity strategy is just one piece of its employee-first philosophy. The firm also invests heavily in mental health, flexible schedules, and a results-driven environment:

  • Mental Health Coverage: Every employee automatically receives coverage for mental health support at no extra cost.
  • No Office Mandates: Sikich embraces “work-life integration.” Employees come into the office only if it makes sense for them or their teams.
  • Trust Over Timesheets: Rather than counting total hours or nonbillable time, Sikich focuses on client satisfaction, deliverables, and meeting deadlines. “Happy employees lead to happy customers,” Ryan said, “and we see that play out again and again.”

Beyond “Book of Business”: Measuring Contribution Margin

Instead of organizing around individual partner “books,” Sikich divides the firm into business units—such as transaction advisory, forensic accounting, marketing services, ERP implementations, and more. Each unit is measured by contribution margin rather than hours:

“We don’t waste time allocating partial overhead or micromanaging nonbillable hours,” Ryan said. “Leaders know who their top performers are based on outcomes, not on how many hours they clock. That fosters collaboration and innovation.”

Internal Mobility and the Emerging Professionals Council

With dozens of specialized service lines, Sikich encourages employees to explore new roles across the firm. Ryan even credits their Emerging Professionals Council for pushing leadership to eliminate strict hour tracking.

“These younger professionals wanted more value-based billing,” he explained. “We want them to move from audit to transaction advisory—or marketing to consulting—if that’s what drives their passion. It keeps our people engaged, and clients get well-rounded expertise.”

Technology and AI as Tools for Growth

Sikich replaced outdated time-and-billing software with a robust, enterprise-level ERP system—one that it also implements for clients. Now, the firm is exploring AI for tasks like summarizing meetings, automating support queries, and analyzing data.

“AI is more evolutionary than revolutionary,” Ryan said. “It speeds up routine work so we can spend more time on strategic thinking and problem-solving. Human judgment remains essential, especially in regulated industries like accounting.”

Ryan Spohn’s Corporate Background

Unlike many firm leaders who rose through the partnership ranks, Ryan built his career in corporate finance—serving as Controller, CFO, and head of shared services in both public and private companies. That perspective helps shape Sikich’s approach today.

“When you’ve been the client, you understand the day-to-day challenges of closing the books or dealing with compliance,” he said. “It influences how we deliver solutions and organize our teams.”

Key Takeaways

1. Reinvesting for the Long Haul – Retaining net income, rather than distributing all profit to partners, ensures funds for talent, technology, and acquisitions.

2. Minority PE Deals Can Preserve Control—Getting outside capital doesn’t have to mean giving up majority ownership if the deal is structured carefully.

3. Broader Ownership Drives Retention – Eliminating massive buy-ins while awarding equity to high performers attracts ambitious talent.

4. Culture and Well-Being Matter – Flexible work, mental health support, and removing excessive time-tracking reduce burnout and raise morale.

5. Technology and AI Enhance—not Replace—Human Expertise. Automating routine tasks frees professionals to focus on complex, value-added services.

By separating assurance from advisory, securing a minority stake from Bain Capital, and making equity more accessible to employees, Sikich exemplifies how professional services firms can modernize without losing sight of people.

If you’d like the whole story, check out my interview with Ryan Spohn on the Earmark Podcast.

Audit Crisis: How Flawed Incentives and AI Are Reshaping the Accounting Profession

· ·

In a recent episode of The Accounting Podcast, we explored alarming trends in audit quality shaking the foundations of our profession. The numbers are stark: the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) found that Ernst & Young (EY), one of the Big Four firms, has a staggering 37% deficiency rate in its audits. Even PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), the “best” performer among the Big Four, has an 18% deficiency rate. These deficiencies are so significant that, according to the PCAOB, the auditors should not have issued their opinions.

As audit deficiency rates remain stubbornly high and scandals shake investor confidence, the accounting profession must confront systemic issues undermining audit quality—including misaligned incentives, inadequate staffing, and outdated practices—to restore trust in financial markets and secure their future relevance.

The Alarming State of Audit Quality

When we discuss a crisis in audit quality, we’re not exaggerating. The deficiency rates reported by the PCAOB paint a troubling picture of the state of auditing in the United States:

  • EY has a 37% deficiency rate—the highest among its peers.
  • PwC, despite performing “best” among the Big Four, still has an 18% deficiency rate.
  • BDO, a top 10 firm, has an alarming 86% deficiency rate.

But what do these numbers mean? A Part 1.A deficiency indicates that the auditor “had not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support its opinion(s) on the issuer’s financial statements and/or ICFR.” In other words, it means the auditor should not have issued their opinion, and potentially, investors should not rely on it.

This is not just a minor oversight—it’s a fundamental audit process failure. When nearly four out of ten audits at a Big Four firm like EY are deficient, or when 86% of BDO’s audits fail to meet standards, we’re looking at systemic issues that threaten the foundation of our financial markets.

The most common deficiencies relate to basic audit tasks:

  • Performing substantive testing.
  • Testing controls over data accuracy.
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of internal controls.

In essence, auditors are failing to perform the core responsibilities that investors rely on them to perform. These high deficiency rates directly erode investor confidence. When investors can’t trust the audited financial statements, the entire financial reporting and investment system becomes compromised.

Why are these deficiency rates so high? We need to examine the business models and incentives driving audit firms to answer that.

Misaligned Incentives and Flawed Business Models

At the heart of the audit quality crisis lies a troubling truth: audit firms’ business models are fundamentally misaligned with the goal of producing high-quality audits. Instead, they incentivize practices that prioritize profit over thoroughness and accuracy.

One primary strategy audit firms employ to maximize revenue is understaffing. Having the fewest people work on the audits leads to overworked staff and rushed audits, increasing the likelihood of errors and oversights.

EY provides a stark example of this strategy in action. The firm boasts the highest revenue per employee among the Big Four at $383,900. While impressive from a business perspective, it raises serious questions about the firm’s ability to allocate sufficient resources to each audit.

Another concerning practice is the lack of transparency around materiality thresholds. Auditors use these thresholds to determine what issues are significant enough to report. However, these standards are not publicly disclosed and can be manipulated. It’s possible to cover up something undesirable by deeming it “immaterial.” This lack of transparency allows auditors to ignore or downplay significant issues, further undermining the reliability of their opinions.

However, the biggest problem is that auditors lack the financial incentive to detect fraud or significant issues. They have every incentive to do the audit quickly, even if it means overlooking critical problems.

These misaligned incentives and flawed business models directly contribute to the high deficiency rates. They create an environment where cutting corners is rewarded, and thoroughness is penalized, contradicting the fundamental purpose of an audit.

The Supermicro Scandal: A Case Study in Audit Failure

The recent Supermicro scandal provides a vivid example of how systemic auditing issues can lead to significant market disruptions and erode investor confidence.

Supermicro Computing, a major player in the tech industry, recently announced an accounting delay that caused its stock to plummet 19% in a single day. This followed a report by Hindenburg Research, which alleged dubious accounting practices at the company.

Based on a three-month investigation, the Hindenburg report uncovered glaring accounting red flags, including:

  • Undisclosed related-party transactions involving nearly $1 billion were paid over three years to suppliers partly owned by the CEO’s brothers.
  • Rehiring executives involved in previous accounting scandals less than three months after paying a $17.5 million SEC settlement for widespread accounting violations.

But where was Deloitte, Supermicro’s auditor, in all of this? Despite charging $4.5 million annually for their services, Deloitte failed to identify or report these significant issues. Their audit letters for 2022 and 2023 were nearly identical, focusing only on inventory valuation as a critical audit matter.

Adding to the concern, an AI system developed by Hudson Rock had identified potential accounting risks at Supermicro two years before these issues came to light. As my co-host, David Leary, points out, “If AI can surface these audit problems before companies can, people aren’t going to want to pay $4.5 million for an audit.”

The emergence of AI challenges the traditional audit model and demands a reevaluation of how we approach financial oversight.

A Call for Reform

The audit profession stands at a crossroads. The alarming PCAOB deficiency rates, misaligned incentives driving audit firm business models, and high-profile failures like the Supermicro scandal all point to a systemic crisis in audit quality.

This isn’t just an issue for accountants and auditors—it’s a threat to the integrity of our entire financial system. Investors rely on audited financial statements to make informed decisions, and when those audits fail, the consequences can be catastrophic.

The emergence of AI as a potentially more effective tool for detecting accounting irregularities further challenges the traditional audit model. Significant changes are needed—from realigning incentives to embracing new technologies—to restore trust in the audit process and secure the future relevance of the profession.

But change won’t happen without a concerted effort from all of us in the accounting world. We must confront these challenges head-on, push for meaningful reforms, and reimagine what high-quality auditing looks like in the 21st century.

To hear our full analysis, including potential solutions and ways you can make a difference, listen to this episode of The Accounting Podcast.

Mastering Prompt Chaining: Unlocking AI’s Full Potential in Content Creation

· ·

As a CPA passionate about tech, I’m always looking for apps that simplify work and boost productivity. The arrival of AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude felt like stepping into a new era, especially for content creation. However, I quickly learned that to truly harness their power, it’s not about tossing out a prompt and crossing your fingers.

Recently, I had the opportunity to discuss this and more on the Amplify! podcast, where we delved into how AI is revolutionizing marketing strategies, particularly in the accounting profession. As I shared on the pod, the real game-changer when using AI for content creation is mastering prompt chaining—a method that’s transformed how I work.

The Limitations of One-Shot Prompts

Consider a common scenario. Suppose you need a 1,000-word blog post on a specific tax deduction for your firm’s website. The straightforward approach might be to type into ChatGPT: “Write a 1,000-word blog post about this tax deduction.” Seconds later, the AI generates an article. Convenient. But here’s the catch.

The content is likely to be generic, lacking depth, and similar to countless other articles online. It’s like expecting a gourmet meal but receiving fast food. The issue? One-shot prompts give the AI minimal direction, resulting in superficial content that fails to engage or inform readers effectively.

Breaking It Down: The Power of Prompt Chaining

To achieve high-quality content, you have to interact with the AI more deliberately. Enter prompt chaining—guiding the AI through a series of targeted prompts to produce superior results. Here’s my step-by-step approach:

  1. Start with Rich Source Material: I kick things off with a transcript from a podcast, an interview, or even a voice memo where I explore the topic in depth. This provides the AI with substantial, authentic content to draw from.
  2. Analyze the Content: I ask the AI to examine the transcript and identify key themes, insights, and potential angles. For example: “Analyze this transcript and summarize the main points discussed.”
  3. Develop a Thesis and Outline: Based on the analysis, we craft a strong thesis statement (the key point or takeaway). Then, I prompt the AI: “Create a detailed outline for an article based on this thesis, including an introduction, key sections, and a conclusion.”
  4. Draft Section by Section: Instead of having the AI write the entire article in one go, I focus on one section at a time. I might say: “Write an engaging introduction based on this outline,” and then proceed through each section individually.
  5. Review and Refine: After each section is drafted, I review it, make edits, and ensure it aligns with my voice and the message I want to convey.

Why Prompt Chaining Works

By collaborating with the AI step by step, prompt chaining offers several benefits:

  • Enhanced Depth and Clarity: The content becomes more nuanced and informative.
  • Authentic Voice Capture: The AI better reflects my tone and style.
  • Improved Efficiency: It saves time by minimizing the need for extensive revisions.

Making AI Your Collaborative Partner

The key is to view the AI as a collaborator, not just a tool. By guiding it through the process—much like mentoring a junior colleague—you tap into its full potential. It’s about providing context, setting clear expectations, and engaging in an iterative process to refine the output.

Ready to Transform Your Content Creation?

Next time you sit down to create content, don’t settle for surface-level results. Break down your prompts, guide the AI through each step, and experience firsthand how prompt chaining can revolutionize your workflow. Not only will you produce higher-quality content, but you might also find the process more rewarding.

For a comprehensive look at how I use prompt chaining and other AI strategies to enhance productivity, tune into the full podcast episode here. We delve into the nuances of prompt chaining, discuss practical applications, and explore how AI can transform your work and personal life.

Blake Oliver, CPA, is the founder and CEO of Earmark, a platform transforming how professionals earn their CPE credits. Passionate about accounting and technology, Blake is dedicated to helping others leverage AI to work smarter, not harder.

From Zero to CPA in 18 Months

· ·

Consider this: Kenyth Holdefer, who once worked in the mortgage industry, obtained both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees and successfully passed all four CPA exams, all within just 18 months. His extraordinary journey challenges traditional pathways to CPA certification and offers a potential solution to the accounting industry’s talent shortage.

Ken shared his story on The Accounting Podcast, revealing how he started his accounting journey with just 12 college credits. “I googled ‘quick bachelor’s degree,'” he said, highlighting his unconventional approach.

Fast-Tracking Degrees Through Competency-Based Education

Ken needed a swift career change. With its competency-based education model, Western Governors University (WGU) offered a solution.

“They have a different education model,” Ken explained. “If you know the material, there’s no reason to do a bunch of assignments and papers on stuff you already know. If you can prove you know the material by passing the test—basically, there’s a final exam—and if you pass it, you pass the class.”

This model allowed Ken to complete his bachelor’s degree in just three months—a process that usually takes four years. After a short break, he completed his master’s degree in 30 to 35 days.

Balancing this intense study schedule with a full-time job and family responsibilities, Ken often studied from 7 p.m. to midnight after putting his kids to bed. Remarkably, the total cost for both degrees was under $10,000—a fraction of what students typically spend on a single degree.

But can such an accelerated program prepare someone for the CPA exam and the accounting profession? Ken’s success suggests that it can, but it requires tremendous self-discipline and motivation. “You have to be very self-motivated to do this,” he emphasized.

Ken’s Intensive CPA Exam Preparation

With his degrees completed, Ken faced the CPA exams. He approached this challenge with the same intensity as his education.

Ken quit his job in January and dedicated six months to full-time study before starting at an accounting firm in June. He scheduled all four CPA exams at one-month intervals, aiming to take them all before receiving any scores.

“I took it extremely seriously,” Ken said. “I documented everything I was doing, how many hours I was studying because I wanted to pass them all on the first try.” His routine was grueling: studying 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, treating preparation like a full-time job.

He explained, “I glanced over all the material, learned a little about everything, and then really focused on the multiple-choice questions and task-based simulations within two weeks of taking the exam.”

Compared to traditional CPA exam preparation over 12–18 months of part-time study, Ken’s method was revolutionary but challenging. “It was a lot of four-hour nights of sleep,” he admitted.

However, the benefits are clear: a dramatically shortened timeline and total focus on exam preparation. Ken’s success proves this approach can yield impressive results for highly motivated individuals.

Implications for the Accounting Profession

Ken’s rapid journey to CPA challenges the accounting industry. With 75% of CPAs nearing retirement, the profession faces a talent shortage. Could accelerated pathways be the solution?

Faster, more affordable routes could attract a diverse pool, including career changers like Ken. However, the profession must ensure that speed doesn’t compromise quality. The CPA license carries weight due to its rigorous standards. Any changes must maintain the high level of expertise expected from CPAs.

Ken’s success suggests it’s time to think creatively about educating and certifying CPAs. By embracing innovation while maintaining excellence, we can ensure a bright future for the profession.

Want to dive deeper into Ken’s extraordinary journey and join the conversation about revolutionizing the path to CPA certification? Listen to the full The Accounting Podcast episode.