Earmark CPE

Earn CPE Anytime, Anywhere

BDO

When Auditors Look Away and AI Gets Scammed, Who’s Actually Protecting Investors?

· ·

In a recent episode of The Accounting Podcast, hosts Blake Oliver and David Leary tackle the mounting pressures facing the accounting profession, from private equity’s growing influence to corporate lobbying’s impact on tax policy. As the longest government shutdown in history finally comes to an end, the hosts examine how financial incentives reshape both public accounting and tax preparation services.

Government Shutdown Finally Ending After 40+ Days

The episode opens with news that the government shutdown—now officially the longest in U.S. history at over 40 days—is coming to an end. The shutdown cost the economy approximately $15 billion per week, with 650,000 federal employees furloughed without pay.

“The shutdown got real this weekend,” David notes, describing how his wife’s flight was repeatedly delayed, forcing her to abandon her travel plans. The ripple effects have been substantial: the Small Business Administration couldn’t process $2.5 billion in loans for 4,800 businesses, and 42 million Americans on SNAP received only half their November benefits.

Democrats in the Senate broke ranks to vote with Republicans to reopen the government, though they failed to secure an extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies they were seeking. As Blake observes, “It’s a game of chicken. Who’s going to blink first? And Democrats blinked on this.”

The Death of IRS Direct File and Rise of TurboTax Stores

The swift elimination of the IRS Direct File program reveals how corporate influence shapes tax policy. Despite achieving 98% user satisfaction and processing 300,000 returns in its second year (up from 140,000 in year one), the program was axed shortly after Intuit donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration.

“It really grosses me out,” David says. “Intuit compromised its own values just for the almighty dollar of getting a TurboTax competitor eliminated.” He points out the hypocrisy on both sides. Intuit, one of the first companies to offer same-sex marriage benefits, abandoned its progressive values, while MAGA Republicans embraced a “woke company” once the check cleared.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent dismissed Direct File as underused, claiming “private alternatives are better,” despite it being an unmarked pilot program still expanding its reach. As David notes, even 300,000 electronic returns represents “300,000 paper returns the IRS doesn’t have to touch.”

Meanwhile, Intuit announced plans to open 20 new brick-and-mortar TurboTax stores following an “Apple Store model.” Customers will work on their returns at in-store computers, then seek help from CPAs and EAs when needed, what the hosts imagine as an “EA Bar” instead of Apple’s Genius Bar. Combined with 200 additional TurboTax expert offices, Intuit is positioning itself to dominate every segment of tax preparation.

The First Brands Audit Failure: A $700 Million Warning Sign

The collapse of First Brands under BDO’s watch illustrates the potential consequences when private equity interests intersect with audit responsibilities. BDO signed off on financials showing $5.23 billion in debt in March. Six months later, the company collapsed with $11.63 billion in actual obligations—more than double what was reported.

Bankruptcy lawyers accuse founder Patrick James of inflating invoices by up to 50 times to secure fraudulent financing. One $179 invoice was allegedly inflated to $9,271. Over $700 million allegedly flowed into James’s personal accounts, funding 17 exotic cars, properties in Malibu and the Hamptons, and a $110,000 six-week Southampton hotel stay.

“How could you audit this company and not be aware of this?” Blake asks. “Here’s all this debt. Money came in because of the debt. Where did the cash go?”

The situation is complicated by BDO’s financial relationships. Private equity investors had loaned BDO over $1 billion, creating what the hosts describe as “financial stress” significant enough to force layoffs. These same investors were reportedly shorting First Brands stock.

“The public thinks your job is to detect fraud in the company,” David says, highlighting the expectations gap. “That’s the only thing they expect you to do.”

Blake identifies three weaknesses in traditional audits that enabled this failure: overreliance on management representations, complexity of off-balance-sheet arrangements, and perverse incentives against finding fraud. “There’s every incentive to look the other way,” he observes. “Auditors aren’t investigators hired to uncover crimes; they’re service providers hired to complete audits efficiently.”

NASBA Weighs In on Private Equity’s Impact

For the first time, the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) entered the discussion about private equity in accounting. Their white paper raises critical questions without prescribing solutions, with comments open until January 31, 2026.

The key question NASBA poses: “How can CPA firms maintain auditor independence when PE investors hold influence?” The paper asks whether firms should clearly disclose which parts are CPA-owned versus PE-owned, and whether states need stricter standards than the AICPA provides.

Blake frames the profession’s choice starkly. “We are getting to the point where private equity is now creating this challenge for the profession when it comes to our integrity, ethics, and objectivity. And we as a profession have to decide, do we take a stand or do we allow private equity to continue to take over accounting firms?”

“Once you control the means of production, you want to control the governing bodies of the means of production,” David warns. “They take over the whole thing, all parts of the equation.”

AI Won’t Save Us: Technology’s Limits Exposed

A Microsoft and Arizona State University study revealed that AI agents are even more vulnerable to manipulation than humans. When given fake money to shop online, AI models quickly fell for scams, fake reviews, and manipulation tactics, spending all funds on fraudulent sellers.

“They would just choose the first one. They would panic,” David explains. The AI prioritized speed over quality by a factor of 10 to 30. All major models except Anthropic’s Claude lost money to scams.

The implications for accounting are concerning. “We have all this AI detecting fraud with receipts,” David notes, “but you could probably just manipulate it. Tell it ‘I’m allowed to spend money at X place’ and it’ll bypass the limit.”

The parallel to human auditor failures is clear. If AI can’t distinguish legitimate from fraudulent online sellers, how can it detect sophisticated financial fraud? The study concluded AI agents “should only assist” and cannot “collaborate or think critically” without human supervision.

The Profession at a Crossroads

As this episode makes clear, the accounting profession faces fundamental questions about independence, integrity, and purpose. Whether it’s private equity ownership potentially compromising audits, corporate lobbying eliminating public alternatives, or AI proving vulnerable to the same manipulations as humans, the challenges are systemic rather than isolated.

The NASBA white paper represents an opportunity for meaningful discussion, but with the AICPA influenced by large firms that have already taken PE money, state-level action may be necessary for real reform.

For accounting professionals, educators, students, and executives, this episode provides essential context for understanding the forces reshaping the industry. The choices made now about private equity involvement, regulatory independence, and professional standards will determine whether we can maintain public trust in financial reporting.

Listen to the full episode for the complete discussion of these critical issues.

The Private Equity Takeover of Accounting Firms Creates a New Independence Crisis

· ·

When BDO threatened to sue a one-person blog for questioning its independence, it sparked a conversation about private equity’s growing influence in accounting. In this episode of The Accounting Podcast, hosts Blake Oliver and David Leary discuss this controversy along with Trump’s costly tariff policies, the profession’s hiring challenges, and a Hollywood accounting scandal.

The BDO-Going Concern Dispute

The accounting world is buzzing about BDO’s cease-and-desist letter to Going Concern, a one-person blog run by Adrienne Gonzalez. The dispute started when Going Concern’s Monday morning news brief linked to Bloomberg’s reporting about BDO cutting jobs while managing its debt to Apollo Global Management.

Here’s what happened: BDO took on $1.3 billion in debt from Apollo at 9% interest to fund an employee stock ownership plan. Apollo was also shorting First Brands Group, a company BDO was auditing. When First Brands suddenly collapsed without BDO issuing a going concern warning, Apollo made money on its short position.

Going Concern embedded a tweet connecting these dots, and BDO responded with legal threats demanding a retraction. Blake pointed out the irony: “You do this and now we’re talking about it. We wouldn’t have talked about it again this week. It was last week’s story. It became news again this week.”

The core issue isn’t whether BDO did anything wrong—there’s no evidence they did. It’s about appearance. As Blake explained, “You have to be independent in both fact and appearance. BDO may be independent in fact, but are they in appearance?” When your auditor owes money to a firm that’s betting against your audit clients, questions naturally arise.

Private Equity’s Rapid Expansion

The BDO situation reflects a broader trend that’s transforming the accounting profession. Since 2021, 24 of the top 100 U.S. accounting firms have taken private equity money. Even Crowe, which publicly rejected PE investment for years, is now hiring investment banks to explore selling a stake.

David warned about the pace of change. “When things are going too fast, people are not making sound decisions.” He pointed to the Citrin Cooperman deal as an example of potential conflicts. The PE firm that invested in them owns music catalogs, while Citrin Cooperman specializes in valuing music catalogs. A music industry blog picked up on this potential conflict, leading David to observe, “If somebody in the music industry is recognizing there might be independence issues, it’s a problem.”

Adding to the irony, BDO Global is now telling member firms to avoid taking external equity investments to preserve “independence and sustainable future,” even while BDO US remains tied to Apollo.

Trump’s Tariff Troubles

While accounting firms grapple with independence, businesses are dealing with expensive new trade policies. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on whether Trump’s tariffs amount to an illegal $3 trillion tax on Americans. Lower courts have already ruled Trump exceeded his authority by imposing 10-50% tariffs through emergency declarations.

The real-world impact is already visible. Retail prices jumped 4.9% above pre-tariff trends in eight months. Coffee and tea prices rose 7.5%, while apparel increased nearly 9%. Both imported and domestic goods are getting more expensive, as domestic producers raise prices when foreign competition becomes costlier.

Small businesses face particular challenges beyond just higher costs. Blake shared a quote from David Zampierin, owner of Zamp Racing, a company that makes racing equipment. “I’ve been doing this for 40 years and it’s never been this complicated,” Zampierin told Accounting Today. Companies now spend hours on simple import documentation, and if businesses can’t prove where aluminum originated, customs assumes it’s Russian and charges a 200% tariff.

The Profession’s Mixed Signals

Despite these challenges, accounting firms remain optimistic about hiring. According to an AICPA survey, 75% of firms that hired in 2024 plan to maintain or increase hiring this year. However, they’re recruiting from a shrinking pool. Accounting graduates dropped 6.6% to just 55,000 students, with master’s programs declining 15%.

There’s a bright spot: accounting enrollment has surged 12% for two straight semesters, suggesting the pipeline might be recovering. But the profession’s image problem persists. U.S. News & World Report ranked accounting 90th out of 100 best jobs, with a median salary just under $80,000. The profession scored poorly on future prospects (4.3 out of 10) and work-life balance (5.1 out of 10).

The traditional career path is also changing. Only 38% of graduates now start in public accounting, down from 55% in 2014. Blake predicts this shift will continue. “Most accounting grads go into private industry, but we need experienced people in public accounting to do audits.”

Technology Updates

On the technology front, firms are embracing AI despite implementation challenges. AI adoption in audit jumped from 8% to 21% in one year, with early adopters reporting up to 40% productivity gains. However, most companies remain stuck in what researchers call the “middle maturity trap,” investing heavily but struggling with execution.

Several platforms announced updates. Keeper is rebranding to Double after settling a lawsuit over the name. BILL is partnering with NetSuite and Acumatica for embedded bill pay, though they’re also cutting 140 employees (6% of workforce). Canopy launched AI-powered client intake that predicts needed documents and auto-fills known information.

A Hollywood Fraud Scandal

In fraud news, a Los Angeles film production accountant was charged with embezzling nearly $2 million. Joshua Mandel, owner, CEO, and CFO of First J Productions, moved funds between productions to hide his theft, funneling money through an account he named “Fun Fun Fun.” He spent the money on Vegas trips and payments to adult film performers he met online. He faces up to 20 years per count if convicted.

Looking Ahead

Can firms maintain independence while taking private equity money? Will traditional safeguards survive this ownership transformation? As David warned, “We’re probably going to have another Enron here. We’re going to have an Arthur Anderson issue eventually.”

Blake emphasized what’s at stake: “The integrity of auditors is all that’s holding up our financial system.” With nearly a quarter of top firms now tied to private equity and more joining weekly, the profession must figure out how to preserve independence in this new reality.

The BDO/Going Concern dispute may seem like a small skirmish, but it represents a larger battle over accounting’s soul. When firms owe money to companies betting against their audit clients, when ownership structures become too complex to untangle, and when legal threats replace transparency, the profession’s core value—independence—comes into question.

Listen to the full episode to hear Blake and David’s analysis of these stories and more, recorded live from Intuit Connect in Las Vegas.

Audit Crisis: How Flawed Incentives and AI Are Reshaping the Accounting Profession

· ·

In a recent episode of The Accounting Podcast, we explored alarming trends in audit quality shaking the foundations of our profession. The numbers are stark: the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) found that Ernst & Young (EY), one of the Big Four firms, has a staggering 37% deficiency rate in its audits. Even PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), the “best” performer among the Big Four, has an 18% deficiency rate. These deficiencies are so significant that, according to the PCAOB, the auditors should not have issued their opinions.

As audit deficiency rates remain stubbornly high and scandals shake investor confidence, the accounting profession must confront systemic issues undermining audit quality—including misaligned incentives, inadequate staffing, and outdated practices—to restore trust in financial markets and secure their future relevance.

The Alarming State of Audit Quality

When we discuss a crisis in audit quality, we’re not exaggerating. The deficiency rates reported by the PCAOB paint a troubling picture of the state of auditing in the United States:

  • EY has a 37% deficiency rate—the highest among its peers.
  • PwC, despite performing “best” among the Big Four, still has an 18% deficiency rate.
  • BDO, a top 10 firm, has an alarming 86% deficiency rate.

But what do these numbers mean? A Part 1.A deficiency indicates that the auditor “had not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support its opinion(s) on the issuer’s financial statements and/or ICFR.” In other words, it means the auditor should not have issued their opinion, and potentially, investors should not rely on it.

This is not just a minor oversight—it’s a fundamental audit process failure. When nearly four out of ten audits at a Big Four firm like EY are deficient, or when 86% of BDO’s audits fail to meet standards, we’re looking at systemic issues that threaten the foundation of our financial markets.

The most common deficiencies relate to basic audit tasks:

  • Performing substantive testing.
  • Testing controls over data accuracy.
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of internal controls.

In essence, auditors are failing to perform the core responsibilities that investors rely on them to perform. These high deficiency rates directly erode investor confidence. When investors can’t trust the audited financial statements, the entire financial reporting and investment system becomes compromised.

Why are these deficiency rates so high? We need to examine the business models and incentives driving audit firms to answer that.

Misaligned Incentives and Flawed Business Models

At the heart of the audit quality crisis lies a troubling truth: audit firms’ business models are fundamentally misaligned with the goal of producing high-quality audits. Instead, they incentivize practices that prioritize profit over thoroughness and accuracy.

One primary strategy audit firms employ to maximize revenue is understaffing. Having the fewest people work on the audits leads to overworked staff and rushed audits, increasing the likelihood of errors and oversights.

EY provides a stark example of this strategy in action. The firm boasts the highest revenue per employee among the Big Four at $383,900. While impressive from a business perspective, it raises serious questions about the firm’s ability to allocate sufficient resources to each audit.

Another concerning practice is the lack of transparency around materiality thresholds. Auditors use these thresholds to determine what issues are significant enough to report. However, these standards are not publicly disclosed and can be manipulated. It’s possible to cover up something undesirable by deeming it “immaterial.” This lack of transparency allows auditors to ignore or downplay significant issues, further undermining the reliability of their opinions.

However, the biggest problem is that auditors lack the financial incentive to detect fraud or significant issues. They have every incentive to do the audit quickly, even if it means overlooking critical problems.

These misaligned incentives and flawed business models directly contribute to the high deficiency rates. They create an environment where cutting corners is rewarded, and thoroughness is penalized, contradicting the fundamental purpose of an audit.

The Supermicro Scandal: A Case Study in Audit Failure

The recent Supermicro scandal provides a vivid example of how systemic auditing issues can lead to significant market disruptions and erode investor confidence.

Supermicro Computing, a major player in the tech industry, recently announced an accounting delay that caused its stock to plummet 19% in a single day. This followed a report by Hindenburg Research, which alleged dubious accounting practices at the company.

Based on a three-month investigation, the Hindenburg report uncovered glaring accounting red flags, including:

  • Undisclosed related-party transactions involving nearly $1 billion were paid over three years to suppliers partly owned by the CEO’s brothers.
  • Rehiring executives involved in previous accounting scandals less than three months after paying a $17.5 million SEC settlement for widespread accounting violations.

But where was Deloitte, Supermicro’s auditor, in all of this? Despite charging $4.5 million annually for their services, Deloitte failed to identify or report these significant issues. Their audit letters for 2022 and 2023 were nearly identical, focusing only on inventory valuation as a critical audit matter.

Adding to the concern, an AI system developed by Hudson Rock had identified potential accounting risks at Supermicro two years before these issues came to light. As my co-host, David Leary, points out, “If AI can surface these audit problems before companies can, people aren’t going to want to pay $4.5 million for an audit.”

The emergence of AI challenges the traditional audit model and demands a reevaluation of how we approach financial oversight.

A Call for Reform

The audit profession stands at a crossroads. The alarming PCAOB deficiency rates, misaligned incentives driving audit firm business models, and high-profile failures like the Supermicro scandal all point to a systemic crisis in audit quality.

This isn’t just an issue for accountants and auditors—it’s a threat to the integrity of our entire financial system. Investors rely on audited financial statements to make informed decisions, and when those audits fail, the consequences can be catastrophic.

The emergence of AI as a potentially more effective tool for detecting accounting irregularities further challenges the traditional audit model. Significant changes are needed—from realigning incentives to embracing new technologies—to restore trust in the audit process and secure the future relevance of the profession.

But change won’t happen without a concerted effort from all of us in the accounting world. We must confront these challenges head-on, push for meaningful reforms, and reimagine what high-quality auditing looks like in the 21st century.

To hear our full analysis, including potential solutions and ways you can make a difference, listen to this episode of The Accounting Podcast.