Could your most trusted employee be secretly siphoning company funds?
In a recent episode of the Oh My Fraud podcast, fraud investigator Kelly Paxton shares how seemingly reliable staff—often overlooked for potential misconduct—can exploit organizational blind spots.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, nearly 90% of bookkeepers in the United States are women. While many people assume women are less likely to commit fraud, Paxton warns that it’s not gender but position and access that matter most. By trusting certain employees implicitly and failing to establish strong controls, businesses inadvertently cause serious financial losses.
As Paxton’s cases illustrate, ignoring stereotypes and adopting “trust but verify” strategies are crucial steps toward preventing fraud.
Kelly Paxton’s Path to Fraud Investigation
Kelly Paxton did not start out in law enforcement. She began her career in financial services as a commodities and bond trader. One day, a U.S. Customs agent called her brokerage firm asking about a suspicious client. Kelly alerted the agents, which led to a deeper conversation—and ultimately, a job offer. She joined U.S. Customs and conducted investigations into money laundering, narcotics, and other major crimes before moving into background checks for federal agencies.
Her investigative focus shifted when she joined a local sheriff’s office and noticed that nearly all the embezzlement suspects she encountered were women. Wanting to understand why, she discovered criminologist Kathleen Daly’s 1989 work referencing “pink collar crime,” a term describing embezzlement often perpetrated by those in bookkeeping or finance positions. Paxton’s takeaway: Access plus trust is the real key—90% of bookkeepers may be women, but it’s the opportunity that matters most.
Understanding Pink Collar Crime
Pink collar crime typically involves smaller amounts stolen over extended periods—fraudsters who make subtle “lifestyle” upgrades rather than lavish purchases. This can happen when the organization deeply trusts an employee. In many cases, they’re seen as family, invited into the home, and never suspected of wrongdoing. Victims are often embarrassed when they discover the truth and hesitate to report it—what Paxton calls “no victim shaming”: the more we shame victims, the less they come forward.
Key characteristics include:
- Position-based access: Bookkeepers and finance staff control incoming or outgoing funds.
- Incremental theft: A pattern of small transactions that grow larger over time.
- Rationalization: Fraudsters may plan to “pay it back” but rarely do.
- Deep trust: Employers assume loyal staff, especially women, “would never steal.”
When Pink Collar Crime Turns Deadly: “Red Collar” Cases
Most pink-collar crimes involve embezzlement without violence. However, some cases escalate to “red collar crime,” where financial fraud intersects with homicide. As Paxton explains, desperate fraudsters may resort to extreme measures when they fear exposure.
The Lori Isenberg Case
One chilling example is Lori Isenberg, a nonprofit executive director in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. Her organization provided housing for low-income individuals—hardly the type of place where you’d suspect significant embezzlement. Yet over three years, Lori allegedly stole between $500,000 and $2.5 million by creating fake accounts, forging checks, and misusing her daughters’ and husband’s names.
When investigations closed in on her scheme, Lori took drastic action. In February 2018, on the same day local news broke a story about her suspected fraud, she took her husband out on a boat trip in the freezing Idaho winter. He mysteriously fell overboard and drowned. An autopsy revealed a lethal dose of Benadryl in his system. Lori claimed it was a suicide attempt gone wrong—an explanation contradicted by digital evidence showing she researched how to drug someone with Benadryl.
After disappearing for four months, Lori was eventually caught and accepted an Alford plea, which essentially concedes that a jury would likely find her guilty without formally admitting guilt. She received 30 years for second-degree murder, with an additional 5 years for her financial crimes, making it highly unlikely she will ever be released. The Lori Isenberg case underscores how far a fraudster might go to avoid being exposed—a stark reminder that misplaced trust and weak internal controls can have devastating consequences.
The Role of Trust, Bias, and Access
Society is conditioned to trust women—parents instruct children to seek a “nice lady” for help if they’re lost, for instance. This assumption carries over into workplaces, where female employees handling finances often face less scrutiny.
Paxton recalls her own days in U.S. Customs: “You put two women in a Honda Accord, and no one thinks anything is unusual. You put two men in a Ford Focus, and they’re pegged as cops.” Similarly, a “helpful bookkeeper” can escape suspicion for years.
What About Sentencing?
Sentencing for embezzlement and related fraud varies widely:
- Federal Cases: They follow sentencing guidelines based on dollar amounts and other factors.
- Local Cases: Judges can have broad discretion. Some jurisdictions impose tough sentences, while others might view fraud as a “civil matter,” limiting law enforcement intervention unless there are other serious elements (e.g., homicide).
This inconsistent approach can embolden perpetrators who believe they can dodge severe penalties—until a high-profile case, a dogged investigator, or a high-stakes victim (like a large corporation) brings full prosecution.
Avoiding Blind Spots: Trust but Verify
Rather than assuming anyone is “too nice” or “not smart enough” to steal, Kelly Paxton encourages businesses and nonprofits to focus on position-based controls:
- Segregate Duties: Ensure no single person handles every financial task.
- Surprise Audits: Don’t just check large transactions; occasionally review smaller ones.
- Vendor Verification: Confirm that vendors and accounts are legitimate, especially if newly created.
- Encourage Transparency: Cultivate a culture where employees and clients can report suspicious activity without fear.
- No Victim Shaming: Publicizing embezzlement—when safe to do so—helps others learn and prevents repeat offenders from quietly moving on to the next company.
Learn More from Kelly Paxton
Kelly Paxton now hosts the Fraudish Podcast (formerly Great Women in Fraud), interviewing fraud investigators, victims, and even fraudsters themselves. She also covers topics like red-collar crime, employee embezzlement, and how biases impact investigations. Her new book, Embezzlement: How to Detect, Prevent, and Investigate Pink Collar Crime, is available on Amazon.
For a deeper look at Lori Isenberg’s story—and other fraud sagas—listen to the full episode of Oh My Fraud. You can also earn CPE credit by downloading the Earmark app and completing a short quiz related to the episode.