• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Earmark CPE

Earmark CPE

Earn CPE Anytime, Anywhere

  • Home
  • App
    • Web App
    • Download iOS
    • Download Android
  • Webinars
  • Podcast
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Authors
  • Sponsors
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Blake Oliver

The Implementation Gap: Why Even Legitimate Tax Strategies Fail During Audits

Earmark Team · April 10, 2025 ·

What’s the biggest mistake tax professionals make? Great ideas that never get implemented. That’s according to Jasmine DiLucci, a tax attorney, CPA, and enrolled agent who has built an impressive following of nearly 500,000 YouTube subscribers by debunking viral tax myths on social media.

I sat down with Jasmine for a conversation on the Earmark Podcast. We kicked things off by discussing the issue of false information about taxes that spreads on social media. Jasmine also highlighted an even deeper concern: even legitimate tax strategies can face serious issues if implemented incorrectly.

Why Social Media Fuels Tax Misinformation

Jasmine says one reason so many “loopholes” and sketchy strategies go viral is that true tax expertise rarely gets posted online. Skilled professionals are busy running firms, while less experienced creators spread half-truths. This leads to flawed tips on topics like clothing deductions or marking up the inside of a shirt with a tiny business logo, all to claim a tax write-off.

The clothing deduction test is a great example. The test has existed for decades, complete with court rulings stating clothes are only deductible if they’re unsuitable for personal wear. But many influencers ignore this, telling people to slap a hidden logo on their regular clothes. As Jasmine points out, these strategies often fail in an audit. Taxpayers who rely on them risk penalties and extra scrutiny.

Implementation Over Theory: The Real Reason Plans Fail

For Jasmine, the greatest pitfall is the implementation gap—the space between hearing a tax idea, reporting it correctly on a return and documenting what was done. 

She highlights the short-term rental loophole as a perfect example. While the idea is legal, most filers never produce the logs, election statements, or rental agreements proving they qualify.

“If it’s not on the return that way,” Jasmine says, “then what did we just do? Nothing.”

Clients often pay thousands for big-picture “plans” but fail to handle bookkeeping or gather the right records. By the time they’re under audit, there’s no backup for the deduction. Those clients face costly disputes with the IRS, sometimes losing deductions they could have secured with basic documentation.

The Shift in Responsibility: Why Clients End Up Holding the Bag

Misinformation creates tension between clients and professionals. Many taxpayers see social media videos telling them they can write off anything. Then, when their tax expert says “no,” it causes conflict. Some preparers cave and let questionable deductions slide. Others keep warning clients but never clearly explain the “why.”

During an IRS audit, that defense of “my tax preparer said I could” means little. The IRS holds taxpayers responsible for their returns. Jasmine notes that low-level auditors sometimes miss legal details, so a wrong deduction might slip by. But if a client’s case goes to appeals or tax court, illusions fall apart without real support.

Bridging the Gap with an Integrated Service Model

Jasmine’s firm avoids the implementation gap by offering an integrated approach: tax planning, accounting, and preparation, all under one roof. She insists on year-round contact, keeping detailed records, and ensuring clients follow the steps for valid deductions. Her team also handles IRS resolutions, so she knows firsthand where taxpayers slip up.

Working with a single provider can prevent the “blame game.” Instead of paying one person for theory, another for the return, and a third for bookkeeping, Jasmine’s clients get everything in one place. This structure helps them stay organized, meet documentation rules, and rely on correct returns from the start.

Scaling Through Delegation and the Right Tools

While her integrated model works, Jasmine admits it wasn’t easy to build. She did almost everything herself early on—sales calls, tax returns, and marketing. Eventually, she found experts who could handle each function at a high level.

She also credits technology for streamlining processes:

  • Canopy for practice management
  • CCH for tax software
  • Calendly for scheduling
  • Slack for team communication
  • Superhuman for email management

For tax research, she recommends the Bradford Tax Institute because it clearly cites legal authority. She warns that AI chatbots sometimes invent court cases, so relying on them can be risky.

Join Jasmine’s Free Community

Jasmine welcomes taxpayers and fellow professionals to her free tax community at actualtaxlaw.com. There, she shares detailed answers about IRS notices, audits, and new tax updates. Users can post questions or upload documents for possible video reviews.

Earn Free CPE for Listening to the Episode

Tax ideas don’t save you money if you don’t implement them correctly. Closing the gap between theory and execution can shield taxpayers from costly audits and give professionals a clear advantage. Whether logging short-term rental days or documenting a true business expense, proper follow-through matters more than any buzzworthy trick.

If you’d like to hear the full interview and gain more insights on best practices, listen to the full episode of the Earmark Podcast. You can also earn free NASBA-approved CPE by registering for the course on the Earmark app and taking a quick quiz to verify your learning.

PCAOB Board Member Reveals Why 46% Audit Deficiency Rate Is Misleading

Blake Oliver · April 1, 2025 ·

When Senator Elizabeth Warren publicly accused PCAOB Board Member Christina Ho of “downplaying atrocious findings” about audit quality, it got me thinking: Do these alarming statistics about audit deficiencies really tell the full story?

The numbers definitely grab attention: Audit deficiency rates rose from 29% in 2020 to 46% in 2023. These figures from the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) suggest that nearly half of all audits reviewed contained deficiencies so severe that “the audit firm had not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support its opinion.” At face value, these statistics paint a troubling picture of the accounting profession.

In a conversation on the Earmark Podcast, I asked Christina to help me understand these numbers. Christina explained the gap between headline statistics and meaningful measures of audit quality.

Understanding the PCAOB’s Role

Before getting into deficiency rates, it’s essential to understand what the PCAOB does. Christina explains, “The PCAOB is responsible for making sure auditors who check the publicly traded companies’ financial disclosures are doing their job well.”

The PCAOB fulfills this mission by registering audit firms, inspecting their work, and enforcing standards through sanctions when necessary. The inspection program represents the largest part of the PCAOB’s operations, with different firms facing different inspection frequencies:

  • The “Global Network Firms” (Big Four plus Grant Thornton and BDO) are inspected annually, with about 50 audits reviewed for each of the largest firms.
  • Firms with more than 100 public company clients are inspected annually, with about 10% of their audits reviewed.
  • Firms with fewer than 100 public company clients are inspected every three years.

The Misleading Mathematics of Deficiency Rates

When the PCAOB announced that 46% of audits reviewed in 2023 contained significant deficiencies, it received considerable attention. In our discussion, Christina pointed out several critical issues with how these numbers are presented and interpreted.

First, these audits aren’t randomly selected. The PCAOB uses a “risk-based approach” that deliberately targets audits they believe are likely to have problems. 

This selection bias fundamentally changes how the statistics should be interpreted. Christina pointed out, “We really can’t extrapolate the deficiency rate to the entire population of all audits because we did not take a statistical sample.”

Even more revealing is what these deficiencies actually mean. Despite the alarming definition, the PCAOB’s own reports include a critical disclaimer that Christina highlighted: “It does not necessarily mean that the issuer’s financial statements are materially misstated.”

In fact, less than 5% of these so-called deficient audits resulted in incorrect audit opinions—the outcome that would truly matter to investors. This stark contrast between the headline figure (46%) and the rate of consequential errors (under 5%) reveals how statistics without proper context can give the wrong impression.

Another significant issue is the PCAOB’s failure to differentiate between levels of deficiency severity. “Our deficiencies… we put everything in the same bucket,” Ho explained. “And in reality, not everything is the same in terms of impact and materiality.”

Unlike internal control evaluations, which distinguish between material weaknesses, significant deficiencies, and minor deficiencies, the PCAOB’s inspection reports do not make such distinctions. This makes it nearly impossible for investors to understand which deficiencies truly matter.

The Disproportionate Burden on Smaller Firms

Christina argued that the current inspection approach unfairly burdens mid-sized audit firms. While the largest firms have a smaller percentage of their audits inspected, firms just above the 100-client threshold face much more scrutiny.

“I personally think that our inspection program is disproportionately burdensome on these firms,” Christina said. This burden is so significant that some firms are intentionally reducing their client base: “They are trying to get rid of their audit clients to get under 100” to qualify for inspections every three years instead of annually.

This creates a troubling situation where firms avoid growth to escape regulatory burden. “I just don’t think it’s good for a very important part of an ecosystem to try to not grow,” Christina said. “We need to make sure we have resilience in the audit marketplace.”

The impact extends beyond individual firms to affect market competition and, ultimately, the capital markets themselves. When mid-sized firms deliberately avoid growth, it concentrates the market among the largest firms—limiting options, especially for smaller public companies.

The Political Fallout

Christina experienced firsthand how deficiency statistics can become political weapons when Senators Elizabeth Warren and Sheldon Whitehouse publicly accused her of “downplaying atrocious findings” after she questioned these metrics in a speech.

“I was very upset about being accused of lying,” Christina told me. “I thought it was very hypocritical of the senators, especially Senator Warren, to essentially bully me because I had a different view from her.”

Rather than reaching out for discussion, the senators sent a letter to the PCAOB Chair, which Christina said left her without “a proper avenue to respond.” This prompted Christina to respond via LinkedIn, where she received significant support from accounting professionals.

This incident highlights how statistics without context can be weaponized in ways far beyond academic disagreements about methodology.

The Search for Better Measures of Audit Quality

Given the problems with the PCAOB’s deficiency rate figures, how should audit quality be measured? Christina suggested several approaches that might be more meaningful:

  1. Look at trends rather than isolated annual statistics. Christina said, “The best way to look at the deficiency rate is not by each year. The best way to look at that data is to be looking at a trend.”
  2. Focus on restatements. Christina said, “Restatements is a much better metric…because that really measures the true impact to investors.” Restatement rates have declined over the past decade, suggesting improvement rather than deterioration in audit quality.
  3. Consider greater transparency. When asked if revealing the names of companies whose audits contained deficiencies would be beneficial, Christina was open to the idea, though she acknowledged the need for broader stakeholder input.
  4. Develop severity ratings. Creating a framework distinguishing between technical violations and substantive errors would provide context for interpreting deficiency findings.

Christina noted that measuring audit quality has been challenging because “audit quality is not quantitatively easily measurable.” And yet, the PCAOB’s approach to deficiencies is to treat all issues identically—regardless of severity or impact.

The PCAOB has been exploring “audit quality indicators” for approximately 15 years but has yet to develop more meaningful metrics. This lack of meaningful data makes it difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the PCAOB’s oversight or the true state of audit quality.

Has Audit Quality Improved?

Christina believes the PCAOB has helped improve audit quality over the past two decades despite the challenges in measurement. When asked about evidence for improvement, she pointed to declining restatement rates and feedback from audit committee chairs and controllers who report improvements in audit and financial reporting quality.

“If you look at the data on the number of restatements and you look at the last ten, twenty years… restatement has been on the decline,” Christina said. “If you look at the AICPA/CAQ study that they released last year… if you talk to [audit committees], they feel that the audit quality has been improving.”

This more nuanced perspective indicates that, despite the worrying headlines about deficiency rates, the overall reliability of financial reporting might be improving.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Audit Oversight

As artificial intelligence and other technologies transform audits, Christina argues for “a more agile approach” to quality measurement—one that can adapt to technological change and focus on outcomes rather than inputs.

After talking with Christina, it’s clear to me that to move forward, we need to find a balance between regulatory oversight, an understanding of how audits work, and what affects the reliability of financial statements. If we don’t, the profession will get bogged down by misleading metrics that only check compliance boxes rather than enhancing what counts: protecting investors through trustworthy financial reporting.

Want to hear the entire conversation with Christina Ho about PCAOB deficiency rates, audit quality measurements, and her experience with political criticism? Listen to the complete episode of the Earmark Podcast.

Streamlining Sales Tax Compliance: Exploring Avalara’s Managed Returns for Accountants

Blake Oliver · March 21, 2025 ·

Managing sales tax is one of the most challenging services to offer clients as an accounting firm.

Collecting sales information and filing tax returns traditionally involves a lot of work. It means logging in to multiple state portals, keying in sales data, and filing returns one at a time. With multiple clients filing in multiple jurisdictions each month, this quickly becomes unmanageable.

There’s also a big risk of making mistakes—if you slip up in one small way, it can lead to extensive notice correspondence and mounting penalties.

During an Earmark Expo webinar, hosts Blake Oliver and David Leary explored how modern compliance platforms such as Avalara’s Managed Returns for Accountants (MRA) allow you to expand your services without substantially increasing staff, risk, or costs.

Introducing a New Approach with Avalara

Avalara’s solutions aim to eliminate much of the repetitive manual work by consolidating data and automating return filings. John Sallese, Director of Strategic Accountant Solutions & Partnerships from Avalara showcased how Managed Returns for Accountants offloads the filing burden onto Avalara after the firm has reconciled the data. 

Here’s how it works:

  1. Data Collection and Review: Firms import or sync sales data from QuickBooks, Shopify, Amazon, or other systems into Avalara. The platform can also recalculate sales tax liability if needed.
  2. Approval by the Firm: After confirming the monthly numbers are correct, the firm marks each return “Approved to File.”
  3. Automated Filing and Payment: Once approved, Avalara files and remits payment on time, assuming responsibility for meeting deadlines, sending confirmations, and handling notices.

John noted that if the firm misses the approval deadline—usually around the 10th of each month—Avalara auto-approves to avoid late filings. 

As an added safeguard, if any Avalara-caused delay results in penalties or interest, Avalara covers those costs under the terms of service.

Two Distinct Service Models: MRA vs. Returns for Accountants

Avalara offers two different models for accounting professionals:

  1. Managed Returns for Accountants (MRA)
  • Firm’s Role: Gather and reconcile monthly data, approve liabilities.
  • Avalara’s Role: File returns, handle payments, and manage notices.
  • Key Benefit: Reduced risk for late filings and penalties, as Avalara takes over once data is approved.
  • Typical Cost: Ranges around $25–$30 per filed return (volume discounts may apply).
  1. Avalara Returns for Accountants (sometimes referred to as “ARA”)
  • Firm’s Role: Owns the full process—import data, finalize calculations, file, pay, and manage notices.
  • Avalara’s Role: Provides the software platform, automation tools, and supports advanced e-filing flows.
  • Key Benefit: Complete control and flexibility over the entire return process.
  • Typical Cost: Generally lower per return because the firm does more of the work.

Many firms adopt both solutions. 

Straightforward filings can go on the MRA model, where the firm approves data and lets Avalara handle the rest. 

Complex cases, such as back-filing multiple years, voluntary disclosures, or clients with inconsistent monthly data, might be better served with the RA model, which grants the firm end-to-end control.

Notice Management and Advisory Opportunities

In addition to filing returns, MRA includes comprehensive notice management. This means Avalara addresses notices from tax authorities and resolves them directly, relieving firms of much of the back-and-forth associated with sales tax inquiries. 

Firms also gain better visibility into potential advisory projects. “You’re not just filing returns,” John emphasized. “If you see clients calculating tax in states where they’re not registered, you can help them register or do a voluntary disclosure.”

Using these platforms can elevate the firm’s role from simple compliance processing to a strategic advisor, offering value-added services around taxability research, nexus studies, registrations, and more.

Implementation Considerations

John shared what to consider when you’re implementing Avalara MRA:

  • Data Integration: Ensure you can connect client systems (eCommerce, accounting, POS) to flow data automatically. This reduces manual entry and ensures more accurate filings.
  • Monthly Workflow: Clearly define who imports data, who reviews it, and when approval is due. MRA’s auto-approval protects against accidental late filing.
  • Client Onboarding: When setting up each client’s “filing calendar,” you’ll specify which returns need filing, the frequency, and any special state requirements. Avalara’s team verifies each setup to confirm accuracy.
  • Pricing Your Services: Whether you pass the per-return fees directly to clients or bundle them into a flat monthly charge, clarify the difference between MRA’s delegated model and RA’s self-service approach.

Elevate Your Sales Tax Practice

Sales tax compliance no longer has to be a necessary evil fraught with manual effort and risk. By choosing the right workflow model—either delegating filings to Avalara (MRA) or keeping them in-house (RA)—firms can scale sales tax services while maintaining appropriate oversight. The key is matching each client’s needs to the best approach.

Want to See a Live Demo?
Catch the full Earmark Expo session featuring Avalara, hosted by Blake Oliver and David Leary. You’ll see a real-time walkthrough of the platform and learn how to seamlessly integrate advanced compliance solutions into your firm’s existing workflow. 

Earn Free CPE

Visit earmark.app to watch the webinar and earn free NASBA-approved continuing professional education credit.

AI’s Game-Changing Impact on B2B Revenue Management

Earmark Team · March 11, 2025 ·

Technology has made many tasks like paying employees, managing bills, and handling expenses much more manageable in business finance. However, tracking revenue—essential for any company’s success—has mostly relied on old tools like spreadsheets and emails, leading to a lot of manual work and confusion. Fortunately, that situation is starting to improve. 

In a recent Earmark Expo webinar, Blake Oliver, CPA, and David Leary explored how Tabs, a new AI-powered platform, transforms B2B revenue management by bringing invoicing, usage-based billing, and revenue recognition under one roof.

Why Revenue Management Has Lagged Behind

Even though significant improvements have been made in automating accounts payable and payroll processes, managing revenue still requires a lot of manual effort. David pointed out that the accounting department is responsible for handling payroll and paying bills, but revenue management often gets divided among different teams, including marketing, sales, and finance.

According to Ali Hussain, CEO and founder of Tabs, “Revenue is just a very complex discipline from a data standpoint.” Each contract can carry unique terms, amendments, and usage triggers. Until recently, this complexity kept automation efforts at bay.

In 2023, artificial intelligence advanced enough to tackle complicated business contracts, even those tucked away in emails or side agreements. Taking a cue from how today’s accounting and payroll systems have combined various tools into a single platform, Tabs offers an all-in-one solution for managing the entire revenue process. This means businesses no longer have to search through multiple spreadsheets, contract systems, and scattered documents to close the books.

From Contract Ingestion to Collections and Revenue reporting: A Look Inside Tabs

During the demo, Caitlin Lu, Head of Partnerships, showcased how Tabs centralizes every step of the revenue cycle:

  1. Contract Ingestion
  • Forward a contract (formal MSA, email agreement, renewal, side letter—English language only) to Tabs’ secure email.
  • Tabs automatically scans the document, extracting billing terms, pricing details, renewal dates, payment schedules, and usage allowances.
  1. Billing and Invoicing
  • Tabs auto-generates invoices based on the extracted terms.
  • Users can edit or confirm billing frequency or payment terms before sending.
  • Integration with QuickBooks or NetSuite is bidirectional: once sent, the invoice syncs to the general ledger, and any subsequent changes in QuickBooks or NetSuite flow back into Tabs.
  1. Usage-Based Billing
  • For companies charging by hourly rates, seat licenses, tiered usage, or any variable consumption model, Tabs removes the need for manual calculations.
  • To share usage data, simply upload CSV files or integrate a BI tool. Tabs then apply the contract’s negotiated rates.
  1. Revenue Recognition
  • Tabs automatically computes deferred, unbilled, and recognized revenue aligned with GAAP requirements.
  • It generates corresponding journal entries for each period, which are ready for import into the GL.
  • For audits, every revenue schedule is tied to the original contract, creating a clear paper trail.
  1. Collections and Renewals
  • A live collections dashboard highlights overdue invoices, pending invoices, and upcoming renewals.
  • Automated reminders can be sent to customers.
  • Renewal information, including price escalators or extended terms, surfaces well ahead of contract end dates, mitigating revenue leakage.
  1. Customer Payment Portal
  • Each invoice includes a secure payment link where customers can pay by ACH, credit card, wire, or check.
  • ACH, checks, and wires incur no additional fees in Tabs; credit card fees depend on the Stripe terms negotiated by the merchant.
  • Tabs applies payments and reconciles amounts automatically, marking invoices paid in both Tabs and your accounting system.

Implementation and Pricing

Unlike traditional billing systems that can take six to nine months to set up, Tabs is designed to help finance teams get started in just one billing cycle. There’s no need for costly technical projects; many companies can simply export their usage data from their product team using a spreadsheet. Tabs takes care of everything else from there.

Tabs offers a straightforward pricing plan with a fixed fee, meaning there are no extra charges based on how much you use the service. They collaborate with Stripe to handle credit card payments, but you can choose any payment processor.

Transforming the Role of Finance

The Tabs approach offers a refreshing solution for accountants who often find themselves overwhelmed by complicated revenue models, spreadsheets, or the hassle of tracking down missing contract updates. Instead of getting bogged down with tedious data entry and reconciliations, finance teams can focus on more valuable tasks. This includes providing insights on pricing strategies or analyzing how profitable different customers are. Plus, the system helps ensure everything is ready for audits and automatically handles journal entries, which helps to minimize mistakes and keeps financial records tidy.

“This is your chance to do more with less,” says Ali. By centralizing contracts, usage, billing, and revenue recognition, Tabs enables finance professionals to be proactive rather than reactive—whether at a large firm managing hundreds of contracts or at a growing SaaS startup looking to modernize its revenue processes.

Ready to Learn More?

If you’re ready to see how Tabs can help, or if you’re an accountant interested in rolling this out to clients, visit tabs.inc and explore the “Partners” section or schedule a demo.

You can also earn free CPE by watching the webinar’s replay and completing a short quiz in the Earmark app. With AI now able to tackle the messy reality of B2B revenue, it’s time to shed that manual work and step into the future of revenue management.

Proactive Cash Flow Solutions for Small Business Clients

Earmark Team · March 7, 2025 ·

Millions of small business owners start every morning the same way—logging into their bank account to see their balance. While 95% of business owners perform this daily check, a recent Cash Flow Compass report from Relay reveals a startling insight: 91% of small businesses face ongoing cash flow challenges. Despite their vigilance, most owners still lack the structures and systems to plan effectively, leaving them vulnerable to late payments, insufficient reserves, and high stress.

Based on a recent webinar featuring Blake Oliver, CPA, and Relay’s own Deanna Zubrickas, this article explores how accountants and financial advisors can move beyond balance-check advising and guide clients toward proactive, data-driven cash flow strategies. By leveraging multiple bank accounts, automated transfers, and regular check-ins, accountants can deliver both financial clarity and much-needed peace of mind to overworked owners.

Let’s dive into some of the key points from the webinar and, more importantly, what you can learn from them. 


1. The Universal Challenge: 91% Face Cash Flow Struggles

In Relay’s Cash Flow Compass survey of over 750 small businesses:

  • 91% of respondents reported dealing with cash flow issues.
  • Common causes include rising labor costs, seasonal fluctuations, and late client payments.

With so many business owners feeling the pinch, accountants have an opportunity to provide high-value advisory services that go far beyond routine compliance work.


2. Overconfidence vs. Reality: The 42% Confidence Gap

One surprising finding is that many owners believe they have a solid handle on their finances—but the numbers tell a different story. On average, business owners are 42% more confident in their cash flow management than is justified by their actual data. This gap creates real risks. 

Blake remarks, “Coming off of a busy season, business owners see a big bank balance and feel invincible. The challenge is helping them realize that money might need to stretch through slower months or seasonal dips.”

This mismatch between perception and reality underscores the need for deliberate systems that track not just daily balances but future obligations.


3. Missing Payments, Personal Stress, and Burnout

Cash flow struggles affect both the business and its people:

  • 31% of respondents missed or were late on major payments, including rent and payroll.
  • 71% reported experiencing significant stress or anxiety due to cash flow woes.
  • 62% said they suffered negative outcomes like delayed projects or losing clients.

For many, delayed payments jeopardize vital relationships with landlords, suppliers, and staff. Even worse, it erodes personal well-being. As Blake noted in the webinar, accountants are uniquely positioned to help clients break this cycle, offering regular check-ins and proactive planning that reduce the risk of crisis—and the accompanying burnout.


4. The Single-Account Trap: Why 24% Use Multiple Accounts

Despite recognizing their vulnerabilities, most small businesses still rely on one operating account for everything. According to the survey:

  • 95% check their balance daily,
  • but only 24% maintain multiple accounts to track and separate funds.

Without additional accounts, it’s easy to mix up funds earmarked for payroll, taxes, or profit distributions. That single lump-sum balance can create a false sense of security. This is where modern tools and advisory play a crucial role.


5. Structuring for Success: Multiple Accounts and Automated Transfers

Relay, the official banking partner of Profit First, offers a clear solution:

  1. Create Multiple Accounts: At a minimum, split finances into an operating account, payroll account, and savings or tax account.
  2. Automate Transfers: Relay lets you set rules so each payment received is split into designated buckets—e.g., 10% for taxes, 15% for profit, and the rest for operations.
  3. Project-Based Accounts: For agencies or firms handling multiple projects, separate accounts for each project can clarify available budgets without waiting for monthly reconciliations.
  4. Receipt Capture & Sync: Relay’s new receipt capture feature (in beta) automatically syncs to QuickBooks or Xero, streamlining bookkeeping and reducing administrative overhead.

By making these processes nearly automatic, business owners start building reserves without having to remember monthly or quarterly transfers. Even small percentage allocations can add up, bolstering that emergency fund. Meanwhile, accountants can monitor activity in real-time rather than sifting through backlogged statements.


6. Advisory in Action: Weekly 15-Minute Check-Ins

A critical element of success is consistent communication. Rather than waiting for quarterly reviews—or worse, an emergency—weekly 15-minute video calls can transform client relationships:

  • Forecast: Quickly update spreadsheets or dashboards, listing upcoming bills, expected deposits, and payroll cycles.
  • Allocate: Ensure auto-transfers are working as intended and address any shortfalls immediately.
  • Plan: Discuss hiring decisions or new projects that might affect cash flow in coming weeks.

This shift from reactive to proactive engagement positions accountants as strategic partners. As clients see their cash flow stabilize, trust builds, and deeper advisory conversations become routine.


7. The Bigger Picture: Reducing Stress and Enabling Growth

When small businesses move beyond bank-balance management, they gain more than just better books—they reduce anxiety, avoid late fees, and seize growth opportunities. With 43% of surveyed businesses having less than a month of reserves, even moderate savings can soften sudden revenue dips or unexpected expenses.

Most importantly, owners get back to focusing on what they do best—running and growing their companies—rather than obsessing over daily balances. It’s a win-win for both the client and the accountant.


Conclusion: Empower Your Clients to Thrive

For many entrepreneurs, the line between personal and business stress is razor-thin. By advocating structured cash flow management—multiple accounts, automated transfers, and regular advisory sessions—accountants can deliver peace of mind while ensuring clients have the resources to grow sustainably.

Ready to see these strategies in action? Watch the full webinar for in-depth conversations, real-world examples, and detailed demonstrations on how to implement a modern cash flow system. Equip your clients to move beyond the daily balance check and lay the groundwork for lasting success.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 13
  • Go to Next Page »

Copyright © 2025 Earmark Inc. ・Log in

  • Help Center
  • Get The App
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Press Room
  • Contact Us
  • Refund Policy
  • Complaint Resolution Policy
  • About Us